Post by account_disabled on Mar 5, 2024 8:41:36 GMT
It is understood that this result is in accordance with the purpose of the law. If the contrary opinion is accepted; Considering that the spouse who is in an unfair position can obtain a divorce decision against the spouse who is expelled from the common residence, forced to leave the common residence, or prevented from returning to the common residence without a justified reason, is free from any hesitation that would be contrary to the principle of the rule of law. Supreme Court of Appeals General Assembly, 25.11.2020, 2017/2289 E., 2020/939 K. The spouse who does not want to return home must prove that he is right. In a divorce case filed on the grounds of abandonment, the defendant must prove that she was right not to return home, but rather to prove that she was right in not returning home.
From the evidence collected, it was realized that France Telegram Number Data despite the proper warning, the defendant did not return to the common residence to which he was invited, even though he did not have a justified reason. It is understood that this result is in accordance with the purpose of the law. If the contrary opinion is accepted; Considering that the spouse who is in an unfair position can obtain a divorce decision against the spouse who is expelled from the common residence, forced to leave the common residence, or prevented from returning to the common residence without a justified reason, is free from any hesitation that would be contrary to the principle of the rule of law.
Supreme Court of Appeals General Assembly, 25.11.2020, 2017/2289 E., 2020/939 K. The spouse who does not want to return home must prove that he is right. In a divorce case filed on the grounds of abandonment, the defendant must prove that she was right not to return home, but rather to prove that she was right in not returning home. From the evidence collected, it was realized that despite the proper warning, the defendant did not return to the common residence to which he was invited, even though he did not have a justified reason.
From the evidence collected, it was realized that France Telegram Number Data despite the proper warning, the defendant did not return to the common residence to which he was invited, even though he did not have a justified reason. It is understood that this result is in accordance with the purpose of the law. If the contrary opinion is accepted; Considering that the spouse who is in an unfair position can obtain a divorce decision against the spouse who is expelled from the common residence, forced to leave the common residence, or prevented from returning to the common residence without a justified reason, is free from any hesitation that would be contrary to the principle of the rule of law.
Supreme Court of Appeals General Assembly, 25.11.2020, 2017/2289 E., 2020/939 K. The spouse who does not want to return home must prove that he is right. In a divorce case filed on the grounds of abandonment, the defendant must prove that she was right not to return home, but rather to prove that she was right in not returning home. From the evidence collected, it was realized that despite the proper warning, the defendant did not return to the common residence to which he was invited, even though he did not have a justified reason.